Difference between revisions of "Network Attached Storage"

From OnnoWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 12: Line 12:
 
    
 
    
 
NAS menggunakan protokol berbasis file seperti [[Sistem File Jaringan (protokol)|NFS]] (populer pada sistem [[UNIX]]), SMB/CIFS ([[CIFS|Server Message Block/Common Internet File System]]) (digunakan dengan sistem MS Windows), atau [[Apple Filing Protocol|AFP]] (digunakan dengan komputer [[Macintosh|Apple Macintosh]]). Unit NAS jarang membatasi klien ke satu protokol.
 
NAS menggunakan protokol berbasis file seperti [[Sistem File Jaringan (protokol)|NFS]] (populer pada sistem [[UNIX]]), SMB/CIFS ([[CIFS|Server Message Block/Common Internet File System]]) (digunakan dengan sistem MS Windows), atau [[Apple Filing Protocol|AFP]] (digunakan dengan komputer [[Macintosh|Apple Macintosh]]). Unit NAS jarang membatasi klien ke satu protokol.
 
 
 
  
 
===NAS vs SAN===
 
===NAS vs SAN===
  
NAS provides both storage and a [[file system]]. This is often contrasted with SAN ([[Storage Area Network]]), which provides only block-based storage and leaves file system concerns on the "client" side. SAN protocols are [[SCSI]], [[Fibre Channel]], [[iSCSI]], [[ATA over Ethernet]] (AoE), or [[HyperSCSI]].
+
NAS menyediakan penyimpanan dan [[sistem file]]. Ini sering dikontraskan dengan SAN ([[Storage Area Network]]), yang hanya menyediakan penyimpanan berbasis blok dan meninggalkan masalah sistem file di sisi "klien". Protokol SAN adalah [[SCSI]], [[Fibre Channel]], [[iSCSI]], [[ATA over Ethernet]] (AoE), atau [[HyperSCSI]].
  
Despite their differences, SAN and NAS are not mutually exclusive, and may be combined as a [[Storage area network#SAN-NAS hybrid|SAN-NAS hybrid]], offering both file-level protocols (NAS) and block-level protocols (SAN) from the same system. An example of this is [[Openfiler]], a free software product running on Linux.
+
Terlepas dari perbedaannya, SAN dan NAS tidak saling eksklusif, dan dapat digabungkan sebagai [[Storage area network#SAN-NAS hybrid|SAN-NAS hybrid]], menawarkan protokol tingkat file (NAS) dan protokol tingkat blok (SAN) dari sistem yang sama. Contohnya adalah [[Openfiler]], produk free software yang berjalan di Linux.
  
 
==History==
 
==History==

Revision as of 11:54, 16 April 2023

Perbandingan secara visual NAS vs. SAN di arsitektur jaringan

Network-attached storage (NAS) adalah level file penyimpanan data komputer yang tersambung jaringan komputer yang menyediakan akses data ke heterogen klien .

Deskripsi

Unit NAS adalah komputer yang terhubung ke jaringan yang hanya menyediakan layanan penyimpanan data berbasis file ke perangkat lain di jaringan. Meskipun secara teknis dimungkinkan untuk menjalankan perangkat lunak lain pada unit NAS, itu tidak dirancang untuk menjadi server tujuan umum. Misalnya, unit NAS biasanya tidak memiliki keyboard atau layar, dan dikontrol serta dikonfigurasi melalui jaringan, seringkali menggunakan browser.

Sistem operasi berfitur lengkap tidak diperlukan pada perangkat NAS, sehingga sering kali sistem operasi sangat sederhana yang digunakan. Misalnya, FreeNAS, solusi NAS open source yang dirancang untuk perangkat keras PC komoditas, diimplementasikan sebagai versi sederhana dari FreeBSD.

Sistem NAS berisi satu atau lebih hard disk, sering kali diatur ke dalam container penyimpanan yang logis dan redundan atau array RAID (array redundan dari disk yang tidak mahal/independen). NAS menghilangkan tanggung jawab penyajian file dari server lain di jaringan.

NAS menggunakan protokol berbasis file seperti NFS (populer pada sistem UNIX), SMB/CIFS (Server Message Block/Common Internet File System) (digunakan dengan sistem MS Windows), atau AFP (digunakan dengan komputer Apple Macintosh). Unit NAS jarang membatasi klien ke satu protokol.

NAS vs SAN

NAS menyediakan penyimpanan dan sistem file. Ini sering dikontraskan dengan SAN (Storage Area Network), yang hanya menyediakan penyimpanan berbasis blok dan meninggalkan masalah sistem file di sisi "klien". Protokol SAN adalah SCSI, Fibre Channel, iSCSI, ATA over Ethernet (AoE), atau HyperSCSI.

Terlepas dari perbedaannya, SAN dan NAS tidak saling eksklusif, dan dapat digabungkan sebagai SAN-NAS hybrid, menawarkan protokol tingkat file (NAS) dan protokol tingkat blok (SAN) dari sistem yang sama. Contohnya adalah Openfiler, produk free software yang berjalan di Linux.

History

In the early 1980s, the 'Newcastle Connection' by Brian Randell and his colleagues at Newcastle University demonstrated and developed remote file access across a set of UNIX machines.Novell's NetWare server operating system and NCP protocol was released in 1983. Following the Newcastle Connection, Sun Microsystems' 1984 release of NFS allowed network servers to share their storage space with networked clients. 3Com and Microsoft would develop the LAN Manager software and protocol to further this new market. 3Com's 3Server and 3+Share software was the first purpose-built server (including proprietary hardware, software, and multiple disks) for open systems servers. Inspired by the success of file servers from Novell, IBM, and Sun, several firms developed dedicated file servers. While 3Com was among the first firms to build a dedicated NAS for desktop operating systems, Auspex Systems was one of the first to develop a dedicated NFS server for use in the UNIX market. A group of Auspex engineers split away in the early 1990s to create the integrated NetApp filer, which supported both Windows' CIFS and UNIX'es NFS, and had superior scalability and ease of deployment. This started the market for proprietary NAS devices now led by NetApp and EMC Celerra.

Starting in the early 2000s, a series of startups emerged offering alternative solutions to single filer solutions in the form of clustered NAS – Spinnaker Networks (acquired by NetApp in February 2004), Exanet (acquired by Dell in February 2010), ONStor (acquired by LSI in 2009), IBRIX (acquired by HP), Isilon, PolyServe (acquired by HP in 2007), and Panasas, to name a few.

In 2009, NAS vendors (notably CTERA Networks and NETGEAR) began to introduce Online Backup solutions integrated in their NAS appliances, for online disaster recovery.

Benefits

The key difference between direct attached storage (DAS) and NAS is that DAS is simply an extension to an existing server and is not networked while NAS sits on a network as its own entity; it is easier to share files with NAS.

Availability of data might potentially be increased with NAS if it provides built-in RAID and clustering capabilities.

Performance can be increased by NAS because the file serving is done by the NAS and not done by a server responsible for also doing other processing. The performance of NAS devices, though, depends heavily on the speed of and traffic on the network and on the amount of cache memory on the NAS computers or devices.

Drawbacks

Because of the need to support multiple protocols and the shared OS layer running on shared hardware, the NAS has its limitations compared to the DAS/SAN systems. If the NAS is occupied with too many users, too many I/O operations, or CPU processing power that is too demanding, the NAS reaches its limitations. A server system is easily upgraded by adding one or more servers into a cluster, so CPU power can be upgraded, while the NAS is limited to its own hardware, which is in most cases not upgradeable.

Certain NAS devices fail to expose well-known services that are typical of a file server, or enable them in a way that is not efficient. Examples are: ability to compute disk usage of separate directories, ability to index files rapidly (locate), ability to mirror efficiently with rsync. One may still use rsync, but through an NFS or CIFS client; that method fails to enumerate huge file hierarchies at the nominal speed of local drives and induces considerable network traffic.

NAS is effectively a server in itself, with all major components of a typical PC – a CPU, motherboard, RAM, etc. – and its reliability is a function of how well it is designed internally. A NAS without redundant data access paths, redundant controllers, redundant power supplies, is probably less reliable than Direct Attached Storage (DAS) connected to a server which does have redundancy for its major components.

Uses

NAS is useful for more than just general centralized storage provided to client computers in environments with large amounts of data. NAS can enable simpler and lower cost systems such as load-balancing and fault-tolerant email and web server systems by providing storage services. The potential emerging market for NAS is the consumer market where there is a large amount of multi-media data. Such consumer market appliances are now commonly available. Unlike their rackmounted counterparts, they are generally packaged in smaller form factors. The price of NAS appliances has plummeted in recent years, offering flexible network-based storage to the home consumer market for little more than the cost of a regular USB or FireWire external hard disk. Many of these home consumer devices are built around ARM, PowerPC or MIPS processors running an embedded Linux operating system.

Open source implementations

Open source NAS-oriented distributions of Linux and FreeBSD are available, including FreeNAS, Gluster, Openfiler and the Ubuntu-based TurnKey File Server. Ubuntu-based TurnKey File Server These are designed to be easy to setup on commodity PC hardware, and are typically configured using a web browser.

They can run from a virtual machine, Live CD, bootable USB flash drive (Live USB), or from one of the mounted hard drives. They run Samba (an SMB daemon), NFS daemon, and FTP daemons which are freely available for those operating systems.

NexentaStor, built on the Nexenta Core Platform, is similar in that it is built on open source foundations; however, NexentaStor requires more memory than consumer oriented open source NAS solutions and also contains most of the features of enterprise class NAS solutions, such as snapshots, management utilities, tiering services, mirroring, and end to end check summing due, in part, to the use of ZFS.

Clustered NAS

A clustered NAS is a NAS that is using a distributed file system running simultaneously on multiple servers. The key difference between a clustered and traditional NAS is the ability to distribute (e.g. stripe) data and metadata across the cluster nodes or storage devices. Clustered NAS, like a traditional one, still provides unified access to the files from any of the cluster nodes, unrelated to the actual location of the data. The examples of commercial products are GlusterFS and IBM Scale-out File Services.

See also

External links

  • NAS-Central - A community site detailing information on many NAS devices and associated articles


Pranala Menarik