Difference between revisions of "Report Penetration Test: Example of Prioritizing (en)"

From OnnoWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page with "To provide suitable recommendations for an IT team related to security vulnerability fixes, risk prioritization is based on the severity level of each vulnerability. The sever...")
 
Line 1: Line 1:
To provide suitable recommendations for an IT team related to security vulnerability fixes, risk prioritization is based on the severity level of each vulnerability. The severity
+
=Prioritizing Vulnerability Remediation Based on CVSS=
level is calculated using the '''Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS)''', which considers the impact and probability of exploitation for each vulnerability.
+
 
 +
To provide the IT team with the most effective recommendations for addressing identified security vulnerabilities, the prioritization of remediation efforts is based on the risk level of each vulnerability. This risk level is calculated using the '''Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS)''', which considers the impact and likelihood of exploitation for each vulnerability.  
  
 
==Risk Categories==
 
==Risk Categories==
  
The vulnerabilities found in this security testing have been categorized into four main risk categories, based on the CVSS score:
+
The vulnerabilities found in this security assessment have been categorized into four primary risk categories based on their CVSS scores:
 
 
* '''High Risk (Tinggi)''': CVSS Score > 7.0
 
**Vulnerabilities with high risk should be the top priority to fix because they can be easily exploited and cause serious damage, such as data breaches, escalated access, or
 
unauthorized access to internal systems.
 
 
 
**Example Vulnerability**: SQL Injection found in the `/login.php` endpoint allows attackers to execute a malicious database query to steal user credentials or gain
 
administrative access to the application.
 
 
 
* '''Medium Risk (Sedang)''': CVSS Score between 4.0 and 7.0
 
**Vulnerabilities with medium risk can be exploited by attackers, but require certain conditions or technical expertise to exploit. Although they are not as critical, they still
 
need to be fixed to prevent potential escalation of attacks.
 
  
**Example Vulnerability**: Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) found in a search form allows script injection into the web application.
+
* '''High Risk:''' CVSS Score > 7.0
 +
** High-risk vulnerabilities should be prioritized for immediate remediation as they can be easily exploited and can cause serious damage, such as data breaches, privilege escalation, or unauthorized access to internal systems.
 +
** '''Example:''' An SQL Injection vulnerability found in the `/login.php` endpoint allows attackers to execute malicious database queries to steal user credentials or gain administrative access to the application.
  
* '''Low Risk (Rendah)''': CVSS Score < 4.0
+
* '''Medium Risk:''' CVSS Score between 4.0 and 7.0
**Vulnerabilities with low risk usually require specific conditions to be exploited or have limited impact on systems and data. Fixing these vulnerabilities can be prioritized
+
** Medium-risk vulnerabilities can be exploited by attackers but may require specific conditions or higher technical skills. Nevertheless, these vulnerabilities should still be remediated to prevent potential escalation of attacks.
after fixing high-risk and medium-risk ones are completed.
+
** '''Example:''' A Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability found in the search form allows for the injection of scripts into the web application.
  
**Example Vulnerability**: Excessive server configuration information displayed in the `500` error page.
+
* '''Low Risk:''' CVSS Score < 4.0
 +
** Low-risk vulnerabilities typically require specific conditions to be exploited or have a limited impact on the system and data. Remediation of these vulnerabilities can be prioritized after high and medium-risk vulnerabilities have been addressed.
 +
** '''Example:''' Excessive server configuration information displayed on the `500` error page.
  
 
* '''Informational'''
 
* '''Informational'''
**Some findings are more informative recommendations for best security practices, and are not considered direct threats. These recommendations can be implemented according to
+
** Some findings are more like recommendations for best security practices and are not considered direct threats. These recommendations can be implemented as resources allow.
available resources.
+
** '''Example:''' The web server does not block rarely used HTTP methods such as `TRACE` or `OPTIONS`.
 
 
**Example Finding**: The web server does not block rarely used HTTP methods such as `TRACE` or `OPTIONS`.
 
  
==Example Prioritization Table==
+
==Example Remediation Priority Table==
  
Here is a table summarizing the findings based on their risk levels:
+
The following table summarizes the vulnerability findings based on their risk levels:
  
 
{| class="wikitable" style="margin:auto"
 
{| class="wikitable" style="margin:auto"
|+ Example Prioritization Table
+
|+ Caption Example Remediation Priority Table
 
|-
 
|-
! No !! Vulnerability           !! Location                   !! Risk Level !! CVSS Score !! Recommendation for Fix        !! Deadline for Fix
+
! No !! Vulnerability !! Location !! Risk Level !! CVSS Score !! Remediation Recommendation !! Remediation Deadline
 
|-
 
|-
| 1   || SQL Injection             || `/login.php`             || High         || 9.0       || Validate input and use ORM   || 1 Week
+
| 1 || SQL Injection || `/login.php` || High || 9.0 || Validate input and use ORM || 1 Week
 
|-
 
|-
| 2   || XSS (Cross-Site Scripting) || `/search.php`             || Medium       || 6.5       || Escape output and filter input   || 2 Weeks
+
| 2 || XSS (Cross-Site Scripting) || `/search.php` || Medium | 6.5 || Escape output and filter input || 2 Weeks
 
|-
 
|-
| 3   || Information Disclosure     || Halaman error `500`       || Low         || 2.5       || Hide server details in logs     || 4 Weeks
+
| 3 || Information Disclosure || Error page `500` || Low || 2.5 || Hide server details in logs || 4 Weeks
 
|-
 
|-
| 4   || Unsecure HTTP Methods     || Konfigurasi server        || Informational || N/A       || Disable TRACE/OPTIONS methods   || N/A
+
| 4 || Unsafe HTTP Methods || Server configuration || Informational || N/A || Disable TRACE/OPTIONS methods || N/A
 
|}
 
|}
  
==Mitigation and Implementation Strategies==
 
  
After conducting risk assessment, the following mitigation strategies are recommended:
 
  
* '''High Priority''': Immediately patch and update systems for vulnerabilities with high risk. Ideally, this should be done within 1 week to prevent further exploitation.
+
==Mitigation and Implementation Strategy==
 
+
 
* '''Medium Priority''': Implement fixes for vulnerabilities with medium risk within 2 weeks. Ensure that no gaps can be combined with other vulnerabilities to increase the risk
+
After conducting the risk assessment, the following mitigation strategies are recommended:
level.
 
  
* '''Low and Informational Priorities''': Fix these vulnerabilities gradually by using patches or system configuration improvements. Focus on improving security settings and  
+
* '''High Priority:''' Immediately patch and update systems for high-risk vulnerabilities. Ideally, this should be completed within 1 week to prevent further exploitation.
preventing future attacks.
+
* '''Medium Priority:''' Implement fixes for medium-risk vulnerabilities within 2 weeks. Ensure that there are no gaps that can be combined with other vulnerabilities to increase the risk level.
 +
* '''Low and Informational Priority:''' Remediate these vulnerabilities gradually using patches or more optimal system configuration enhancements. Focus on improving security settings and preventing future attacks.
  
 
==Conclusion==
 
==Conclusion==
  
Determining vulnerability priority based on severity is designed to maximize the use of security resources efficiently, focusing primarily on vulnerabilities with the greatest  
+
Prioritizing remediation based on risk level is designed to maximize the efficient use of security resources, with a primary focus on vulnerabilities that have the greatest potential impact on system security. Implementing the recommended remediation will improve the security posture and reduce the risk of future attacks.
potential impact on system security. Implementing recommended fixes will increase security posture and reduce the risk of future attacks.
+
 
 +
 
 +
'''Additional Notes:'''
 +
 
 +
* '''CVSS:''' The Common Vulnerability Scoring System is a widely used open framework for assessing the severity of computer system vulnerabilities.
 +
* '''SQL Injection:''' A type of injection attack that occurs when an attacker is able to execute malicious SQL statements through a web application's input fields.
 +
* '''XSS:''' Cross-Site Scripting is a type of injection in which malicious scripts are injected into otherwise benign and trusted web pages.
 +
* '''ORM:''' Object-Relational Mapping is a programming technique for converting data between incompatible type systems in object-oriented programming languages.
  
==Interesting Links==
+
'''Related Links'''
  
 
* [[Ethical Hacking]]
 
* [[Ethical Hacking]]

Revision as of 07:42, 28 October 2024

Prioritizing Vulnerability Remediation Based on CVSS

To provide the IT team with the most effective recommendations for addressing identified security vulnerabilities, the prioritization of remediation efforts is based on the risk level of each vulnerability. This risk level is calculated using the Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS), which considers the impact and likelihood of exploitation for each vulnerability.

Risk Categories

The vulnerabilities found in this security assessment have been categorized into four primary risk categories based on their CVSS scores:

  • High Risk: CVSS Score > 7.0
    • High-risk vulnerabilities should be prioritized for immediate remediation as they can be easily exploited and can cause serious damage, such as data breaches, privilege escalation, or unauthorized access to internal systems.
    • Example: An SQL Injection vulnerability found in the `/login.php` endpoint allows attackers to execute malicious database queries to steal user credentials or gain administrative access to the application.
  • Medium Risk: CVSS Score between 4.0 and 7.0
    • Medium-risk vulnerabilities can be exploited by attackers but may require specific conditions or higher technical skills. Nevertheless, these vulnerabilities should still be remediated to prevent potential escalation of attacks.
    • Example: A Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability found in the search form allows for the injection of scripts into the web application.
  • Low Risk: CVSS Score < 4.0
    • Low-risk vulnerabilities typically require specific conditions to be exploited or have a limited impact on the system and data. Remediation of these vulnerabilities can be prioritized after high and medium-risk vulnerabilities have been addressed.
    • Example: Excessive server configuration information displayed on the `500` error page.
  • Informational
    • Some findings are more like recommendations for best security practices and are not considered direct threats. These recommendations can be implemented as resources allow.
    • Example: The web server does not block rarely used HTTP methods such as `TRACE` or `OPTIONS`.

Example Remediation Priority Table

The following table summarizes the vulnerability findings based on their risk levels:

Caption Example Remediation Priority Table
No Vulnerability Location Risk Level CVSS Score Remediation Recommendation Remediation Deadline
1 SQL Injection `/login.php` High 9.0 Validate input and use ORM 1 Week
2 XSS (Cross-Site Scripting) `/search.php` 6.5 Escape output and filter input 2 Weeks
3 Information Disclosure Error page `500` Low 2.5 Hide server details in logs 4 Weeks
4 Unsafe HTTP Methods Server configuration Informational N/A Disable TRACE/OPTIONS methods N/A


Mitigation and Implementation Strategy

After conducting the risk assessment, the following mitigation strategies are recommended:

  • High Priority: Immediately patch and update systems for high-risk vulnerabilities. Ideally, this should be completed within 1 week to prevent further exploitation.
  • Medium Priority: Implement fixes for medium-risk vulnerabilities within 2 weeks. Ensure that there are no gaps that can be combined with other vulnerabilities to increase the risk level.
  • Low and Informational Priority: Remediate these vulnerabilities gradually using patches or more optimal system configuration enhancements. Focus on improving security settings and preventing future attacks.

Conclusion

Prioritizing remediation based on risk level is designed to maximize the efficient use of security resources, with a primary focus on vulnerabilities that have the greatest potential impact on system security. Implementing the recommended remediation will improve the security posture and reduce the risk of future attacks.


Additional Notes:

  • CVSS: The Common Vulnerability Scoring System is a widely used open framework for assessing the severity of computer system vulnerabilities.
  • SQL Injection: A type of injection attack that occurs when an attacker is able to execute malicious SQL statements through a web application's input fields.
  • XSS: Cross-Site Scripting is a type of injection in which malicious scripts are injected into otherwise benign and trusted web pages.
  • ORM: Object-Relational Mapping is a programming technique for converting data between incompatible type systems in object-oriented programming languages.

Related Links